The Costume and the People

In 1972, David Bowie told Melody Maker magazine "I'm gay, and always have been, even when I was David Jones." He was married at the time, with a young son. The statement was either an act of extraordinary courage or a calculated provocation, and the honest answer is probably both. For a generation of young people who had never seen anyone in mainstream popular culture claim a queer identity with that kind of confidence and theatricality, it was a lifeline. For the next decade, Bowie built one of the most singular careers in the history of rock music in large part by drawing deeply from queer culture: its aesthetics, its vocabulary, its performance traditions, its emotional register. Then in 1983, sitting in Australia with a reporter from Rolling Stone and a couple of cans of Foster's Lager, he said it was all the biggest mistake he ever made. The timing could not have been worse. The fallout lasted for years. And the question of what Bowie actually was, and what he owed the community he had used so well, never fully resolved before he died.

What Ziggy Actually Did

It is difficult to overstate how radical Bowie's early 1970s presentation was in the context of its moment. Homophobia in Britain was not a fringe position. Section 28, which prohibited the promotion of homosexuality in schools, would not become law until 1988, but the social climate it eventually codified was the dominant reality of Bowie's early career. Gay men were routinely harassed, fired, prosecuted. Queer culture existed in pockets: the clubs, the underground press, the coded language of Polari that gay men used to communicate in public without being understood by everyone else. Into this landscape walked a man in full makeup and a jumpsuit open to the chest on Top of the Pops, watched by fourteen million people, announcing with complete apparent ease that he was gay.

The response among queer audiences was immediate and profound. For young gay men and women and gender-nonconforming people who had never seen anyone like themselves reflected back in mainstream culture, Ziggy Stardust was not just entertainment. He was evidence that such a person could exist publicly. Singer Tom Robinson, who would himself become one of Britain's first openly gay rock performers, said Bowie was seismic for gay musicians. Countless testimonies from people who came of age in that era describe the same thing: Bowie as the first point of recognition. The first time they thought maybe there was a place in the world for someone like them.

Bowie himself was clear, even at the time, about the relationship between his identity and the character. In 1976 he told Playboy: "It's true, I am a bisexual. But I can't deny that I've used that fact very well. I suppose it's the best thing that ever happened to me." That is not the statement of someone who believes he is simply playing a role. It is the statement of someone who knows exactly what he is doing and is comfortable with the transaction. The queer community gave Bowie something real and he gave something real back. For a decade, that exchange worked.

1983 and the Calculation That Wasn't

By 1983 the world had changed. AIDS had arrived with catastrophic force. Gay men were dying in enormous numbers and the cultural response in much of the mainstream was not sympathy but terror and contempt. Being associated with queer identity in 1983 carried a different weight than it had in 1972. Bowie was preparing to release Let's Dance, his most commercially ambitious album, a collaboration with Nile Rodgers of Chic that would eventually sell eleven million copies and earn Bowie an estimated fifty million dollars in that year alone. He was, for the first time in his career, going for the widest possible mainstream audience.

Rolling Stone ran the headline "David Bowie Straight." The interview, conducted by Kurt Loder, contained the line that would follow Bowie for the rest of his life. "The biggest mistake I ever made," he told Loder, "was telling that Melody Maker writer that I was bisexual. Christ, I was so young then. I was experimenting." Loder's own framing in the piece was categorical: "He is not gay, whatever he may have blurted out in 1972." The cover of the album that year included a sanitized lyrical rewrite of a song Bowie was covering that the BBC had previously banned for its allusions to gay sex. The retreat was comprehensive.

Whether this was pure commercial calculation or a genuine expression of how Bowie understood himself at the time is genuinely unknowable. He was not a simple person and his relationship with identity was never simple. What is not unknowable is the effect. For queer people who had held onto Bowie as evidence that they could exist openly, the reversal landed as an act of abandonment. One writer described having been on the verge of coming out to people close to him in 1983, having taken courage partly from Bowie's example, and having the courage drain away completely when the Rolling Stone headline appeared. Bowie had used queer identity as the best thing that ever happened to him, by his own account. When it stopped being useful, he put it down.

The Contradiction He Never Fully Resolved

Bowie did not hold the 1983 position without complication. In later years he shifted again, and repeatedly. In a 1993 Rolling Stone interview he said he had always been a closet heterosexual and had not found same-sex experiences enjoyable, but described the performances of queerness as necessary to building Ziggy as a character. In 2002 he told Blender something more nuanced: "I don't think it was a mistake in Europe, but it was a lot tougher in America. I had no problem with people knowing I was bisexual. But I had no inclination to hold any banners or be a representative of any group of people." That last sentence is the most revealing. Bowie was clear that he had not wanted to be a representative. The people who needed a representative did not have that option.

The question that never gets a clean answer is whether Bowie's use of queer culture constitutes appropriation in the way the term is understood today. He was a straight man, or said he was, who absorbed the aesthetic of a persecuted community, built a commercially transformative career partly on that absorption, and then publicly distanced himself from the community at its moment of greatest crisis. That framing is accurate as far as it goes. What it leaves out is that the impact of what he did in 1972 and the years that followed was genuinely liberating for a large number of real people, and that the liberation did not disappear when he recanted. The people Bowie gave courage to in the 1970s did not un-receive it in 1983. The harm and the good existed simultaneously and neither cancels the other.

What the Legacy Actually Looks Like

Critic John Gill, writing about this period, said Bowie had used and betrayed gay culture, but also that Bowie had emboldened many people to be more open about their sexuality. Both statements are true. They do not resolve into a verdict. Bowie was not a gay rights activist who abandoned the cause. He was an artist who borrowed a set of cultural materials, used them brilliantly, benefited enormously from them, and was unwilling to accept the obligations that came with the borrowing when those obligations became costly. That is a more specific and more damning description than calling him an appropriator, because it names the transaction precisely.

What Bowie left behind is genuinely enormous. The mainstreaming of androgyny in popular culture, the cracking open of what masculinity was allowed to look like in rock music, the specific gift of visibility to a generation of queer young people who had none: these are real and significant things. They belong to Bowie's legacy regardless of the 1983 interview. So does the 1983 interview. His relationship with queer culture was not a lie, but it was never entirely honest either. He used it well, as he said himself. That is not the same as having been part of it. The costume was extraordinary. The people wearing it for real never got to take it off.

Explore David Bowie on Sonic City